|
| |
RODNEY
HAKIM
ACTOR/DIRECTOR
SHAKESPEARE APOCRYPHA
Shakespeare's plays are
usually divided into four main categories; Comedies, Tragedies, Histories, and
Romances. Some editors opt for three categories, clumping the comedies and
romances into one group. Others go in the opposite direction and add a
fifth category called the Problem Plays, in which they insert the plays that
don't quite fit neatly into the four primary molds. Regardless, few
collections make reference to yet another category of Shakespeare's plays, the
Apocrypha.
The Apocrypha is a collection of plays that have
been claimed to be written by Shakespeare, but which most scholars and editors
believe were not. The general consensus among scholars is that the
Apocryphal plays were plays to which Shakespeare contributed a couple of scenes
or lines, at the most , but which for the most part, he did not write.
Shakespeare had become a very popular playwright in the 1600's, so his name (or
even his initials) was often tacked on to plays to help bolster ticket sales.
Apocryphal plays, of which there are nearly thirty, include Cardenio,
Fair Em, and A Yorkshire
Tragedy.
The issue of which plays are Apocryphal and which
plays are truly Shakespeare's is debatable, and has been a hot-button issue
among Shakespeareans in recent times. Currently, there are 38 plays that
are commonly accepted as truly belonging to Shakespeare. One of those
plays, Two Noble Kinsmen, is highly
controversial, as it is classified by many as a Problem Play (but still one of
the 38 that are really Shakespeare's), while others insist that it is
Apocryphal. Another controversial play is Edward III,
which has long been considered Apocryphal, but which has recently gained
acceptance by most editors as a true Shakespeare play. If we go ahead and
categorize those two plays as Apocryphal, we then have 36 plays that are
definitely Shakespeare's. Kind of.
Many other plays that are commonly accepted as
being Shakespeare's, such as Henry VIII
and All's Well that Ends Well,
have entire scenes or even acts that are thought by scholars to have been
written by other playwrights, but which are still considered to be authentic
Shakespeare plays. It's not just the obscure History plays or Problem
plays; there are even chunks of Macbeth
and The Taming of the Shrew that
scholars
believe to be
interpolations. We won't even get into into the mechanics of how the
plays were written and recorded, and the differences between Shakespeare's
"fair" and "foul papers," or the Quarto and Folio editions of the plays as
opposed to the versions of the plays we know today. The more we delve into
these issues, the more problematic things become.
Suffice it to say that the
question of which plays can really be considered Shakespeare's and which are
Apocryphal is even further complicated by the larger question of whether
Shakespeare was really Shakespeare. There has been a growing debate about
whether William Shakespeare really wrote his own plays, or if "Shakespeare" was
the nom de plum of other Elizabethan playwrights. Some theories suggest
that the plays we currently attribute to Shakespeare were really written by
Queen Elizabeth, the Earl of Oxford (Edward DeVere), the mysteriously murdered
Christopher Marlowe, and/or various others. Each theory offers its
own body of evidence, some being stronger than others.
Ultimately, these questions
can never be definitively answered, as there's no absolute proof that tells us
who really wrote Shakespeare's plays, or which ones are absolutely Shakespeare's
and which are only tangentially connected to him. It's a fascinating
subject, and one that is perhaps best approached by performing the plays, and
letting the audiences determine which ones should stand the test of time.
Check back soon for a
complete list of Shakespeare's plays, and for reference information about the
Apocrypha and the Shakespearean authorship debate.
© 2008 Rodney Hakim
|